Comorbidity among axis II diagnoses was common. Subjects met the criteria for an average of 2.4 personality disorder diagnoses (SD=1.6). The subjects with borderline personality disorder were more likely than those without borderline personality disorder to meet the criteria for histrionic (29.2% versus 5.6%; ? 2 =, df=1, p<0.0005), narcissistic (30.6% versus 15.7%; ? 2 =5.59, df=1, p=0.02), and antisocial (12.5% versus 3.7%; ? 2 =4.98, df=1, p=0.03) personality disorder. Subjects with paranoid personality disorder were more likely than those without paranoid personality disorder to meet the criteria for schizotypal (49.2% versus 20.5%; ? 2 =, df=1, p<0.0005), narcissistic (33.3% versus 15.4%; ? 2 =7.77, df=1, p=0.005), histrionic (23.5% versus 10.3%; ? 2 =5.90, df=1, p=0.02), and antisocial (12.7% versus 4.3%; ? 2 =4.34, df=1, p=0.03) personality disorder. Subjects with borderline personality disorder had a higher number of personality disorder diagnoses (other than borderline personality disorder) than subjects without borderline personality disorder (mean=2.3 diagnoses, SD=1.7, versus mean=1.8 diagnoses, SD=1.1; t=–2.35, df=178, p=0.02). Subjects with paranoid personality disorder also had a higher number of personality disorders (other than paranoid personality disorder) than subjects without paranoid personality disorder (mean=2.5 diagnoses, SD=1.7, versus mean=1.8 diagnoses, SD=1.1; t=–3.44, df=178, p=0.001).
Injury within the Youthfulness or Puberty
Desk 2 shows new prevalence regarding connection with trauma throughout the childhood/puberty in victims having and you can in the place of borderline personality illness. Subjects which have borderline identification ailment had rather higher prices out of actual punishment in the childhood/adolescence than just sufferers in place of borderline identification ailment, which have sex managed (52.8% in the place of 34.3%; ? dos =5.43, df=1, p=0.02), nevertheless organizations don’t disagree in their pricing from intimate punishment (29.2% instead of 19.4%; ? dos =1.46, df=step 1, p=0.23) or away from other types of upheaval from inside the teens/adolescence.
Subjects which have paranoid personality ailment along with got a substantially high rate out-of real abuse within the teens/puberty than sufferers versus paranoid character ailment, that have gender controlled (54.0% instead of thirty five.0%; ? dos =5.70, df=step one, p=0.02). 4% instead of twenty two.2%; ? dos =0.23, df=1, p=0.63) or out of other types of stress into the teens/adolescence. New relationships out of teens/teenage physical abuse with borderline identity illness along with paranoid identification disorder have been and additionally checked by using all the other identification infection diagnoses since the extra covariates, together with performance was indeed mathematically similar.
Sufferers having antisocial identification diseases was indeed apt to be as opposed to those without antisocial personality disease having already been bereaved for the childhood (53.8% instead of 21.0%; ? 2 =7.67, df=1, p=0.006). Nothing of the other kinds of personality sickness try somewhat and you may seriously of sexual punishment, actual abuse, or all other types of injury in teens/puberty.
Stress during the Adulthood
The new rates off contact with stress into the adulthood into the victims that have and you may as opposed to borderline personality sickness also are found during the Dining table 2. Borderline identification infection was not rather of bodily violence, intimate physical violence, or any other sorts of traumatization during the adulthood, as we grow older and sex controlled. Subjects having paranoid identification problems was in fact more most likely compared to those in place of paranoid identification problems getting experienced actual assault into the adulthood, as we grow older and you can sex managed (33.0% in place of 17.9%; ? dos =cuatro.84, df=1, p=0.03). Those with paranoid identity sickness in addition to had high prices off accidents/burns off (63.5% versus 47.0%; ? 2 =cuatro.86, df=step one, p=0.03) and you will treat (9.5% rather than 1.7%; ? dos =6.forty eight, df=1, p=0.01) as opposed to https://www.datingranking.net/cs/single-parent-match-recenze those without any illness, but these differences just weren’t statistically extreme pursuing the ramifications of several evaluations was basically managed. Not one of your other kinds of identification infection are significantly relevant that have any type of upheaval into the adulthood.
Prevalence of PTSD
The fresh existence prevalence off PTSD within this number of sufferers is actually 17.8% (N=32). The new pricing out-of PTSD in females (19.0%, N=12) and you can men (17.1%, N=20) weren’t significantly different (? dos =0.11, df=step one, p=0.74). PTSD try most common inside sufferers having paranoid (29%) and you will borderline (25%) character illness, and the very least well-known inside subjects with narcissistic (10%) and you will passive aggressive (12%) personality illness. For the left kind of personality illness, this new frequency away from PTSD varied out-of fourteen% to 18%. Sufferers with and versus PTSD don’t disagree in their overall number of character ailment diagnoses (mean=2.5, SD=step one.dos, as opposed to imply=dos.cuatro, SD=step one.6; t=–0.36, df=178, p=0.72).